Dissident Uprising Seeks Action Plan

At the time of writing, our latest poll shows 90% of 2,251 Leeds United fans have no confidence in Ken Bates’ ability to take this club forward. Protests were held last Thursday and ahead of our Championship clash against Ipswich Town on Saturday and after seven years at the helm, the vast majority of fans are ready to take action.

Quite what that action should be however is a highly contentious and unresolved issue. As ever, Leeds United fans are at odds with one another and struggling to find common ground. Some think the protests should be as vocal and visible as possible, hoping to garner media attention and force the issue into the minds of the general public, whilst others believe such efforts are in vain; that Ken Bates will soldier on regardless and that such actions risk destabilising an already shaky team.

The truth is, both sides make a fair argument. Whilst I’ve seen nothing to suggest the performance of our team is in anyway affected by unrest in the stands, it’s impossible to dismiss that argument completely. I’m sure the players know this isn’t about them and if they did have a problem with the protests, wouldn’t they have released a statement calling for calm by now?

We can’t say for certain either way. We’re all just throwing opinions around in a non-constructive manner and it’s achieving nothing. That includes the protests themselves.

The trouble is, the protests send no clear message. The only reason people gather on mass to shout about something is because they know the local/national media will take an interest and their message will be spread to a wider audience.

Working in London, I’m ideally placed to gauge opinion from the wider public. This morning, I arrived at work and the general consensus seemed to be that Leeds United fans were throwing a mass tantrum because their captain has been sold.

Is that the message we were trying to send? Because I can fully understand why people have come to that conclusion.

The problem we have now is the same problem we had last time. There is no leadership, no organisation leading the charge and spreading the fans message. In creating a club owned Leeds United Members Club, Ken Bates sought to put an end to the democratic fan organisations we’d relied on previously. It is these organisations that are best placed to gauge opinion, speak for the majority and work on a constructive plan of action.

There is no hidden agenda, any Leeds United fan can join, voice their opinion and then everyone unites behind a common goal. It’s not perfect, no one ever claimed democracy was, but it’s certainly more constructive than the haphazard approach we’ve taken so far. You’re not always going to agree with the majority decision, that’s life, but fans should stand shoulder-to-shoulder regardless. I doubt there’s ever been one example where employees of a company unanimously agreed with industrial action, but they’ll stand together all the same.

After seven years, we may finally be making some progress. Many fans have turned to the Leeds United Supporters Trust for leadership, who in turn balloted members and found the majority were in support of the “Bates Out” campaigns.

As the wheels of democracy slowly grind into action, LUST has arranged a strategy meeting for 19:30 tomorrow night (Tuesday 24th of January) at The Magic Sponge where members and non-members alike can gather to voice their opinion and try to agree on a way forward.

For me, this is how it should have worked all along. A democratic supporters club has finally stepped up to take the lead and offered all fans the chance to have their say. Whether you agree with protests or not, I strongly recommend you attend the meeting tomorrow night and get your point across. After all, there’s little point moaning once something has been decided.

Democracy rules and whatever plan LUST sets out tomorrow night, I’ll back it to the hilt – regardless of whether I agree with it personally. That’s the only way we can address this issue in a constructive and positive manner.

Marching On Together! 

Photo Credit: Alex Knight Photography

Author

TSS

Founder and editor of The Scratching Shed, born locally and have followed Leeds United all my life from the dizzying heights of Europe, to the dark depths of League One. Prone to the occasional Bates rant.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Just a thought, but wouldnt it be better if we all petitioned HRMC to reinvestigate KB's dodgy dealings when we went into administration for the second time?

If enough of us kicked up a stink and brought it to the publics attention that HRMC are owed so many millions by Leeds but dont seem to be doing anything about it, it will surely shame them into action.

Then with a good forensic account in place they can begin to unravel the web KB has spun around the ownership of Leeds United. And if underhand dealings are brought to light, it will KB who will be doing porridge for his wrong doing, and not the club who will be punished.

This way we get rid of the cancer once and for all and our club can move on without having that millstone around our neck.

MOT

i will be going as im a s.t holder and he already has his grubby paws on my dosh, what he hasnt got and isnt getting is my s.t money for next year. with this i appeal to all fans when i say do not renew. when this club starts to cost him money he will be gone of that i am certain. he is just riding it out for every penny he can get, as soon as that goes pear shaped we will have rid. the longer we fund the longer he will be here, he would be daft not to.

I agree with the article completely, we need a goal, we need a plan/strategy, we need a leader, & we need action! But as with everything a huge majority must follow to really have an impact, we have to march TOGETHER! People say it will affect the squad, boycotting will look like we've abandoned the club & it will cause unrest. It probably will, but if you look at other teams & squads in this division I honestly think we'll struggle for play-offs, its a hard thing to say, & if we did does anyone think we'd get through? That isn't to say i wouldn't be ecstatic if we did. But looking at how we've performed this season there have been times lady luck (& Snoddy) has carried us. We as fans have experienced ups & downs, we have stood by the club, we have to be some of the most loyal fans in football & no1 is asking us to stop supporting, stop wearing the shirt, stop loving the club! The thing we have to do is communicate to the regime we aren't stupid, we aren't MORONS, we know the money we invest (premiership prices) we know how strong our fan base is, we know we get decent television coverage (for championship), we buy the new shirt every year, we have a rough idea of transfer money in & outs, & we can work out that the investment is in no way proportionate. If Bates actually ran the club like we wanted we'd ignore his excentric rants, the Chelsea ties. But it ain't going too happen. To affect him, we have to impact the club, it's not a nice idea, but honestly what else do we have? Money is the one thing Bates cares about, he ain't interested in our opinion of him that's for sure. Protest to the media, empty Elland road for Bates. Yeah it's not fair on Grayson & the players, but Bates don't fight fair! Least he can't argue it's the few not the many, as we know when he comes under fire from the press himself.

Re. Proposed action for live Sky game against Southampton

"Seven Against Bates" ......How about a seven minute boycott (one for each year of Bates' tenure), everyone stays outside the ground Chanting slogans, etc, and we all make our way into the ground on seven minutes? Cue cameras hopefully get to see large crowds outside the ground and no home fans in it ........embarrassing for Bates if noting else........

I think it's a good idea, altho only communicates are unhappiness to Press, I'm not sure Ken would care, you still paid him after all!

@Aideylufc Agreed to a point, although we still get to see most of the game, support the team, AND Bates realises there are more than just a 'few' 'morons' protesting.......

Bates knows its not the few, it's the many, he has too, but he knows us fans are to loyal, we keep ploughing the money in, & I think that's the problem. It's hard to suggest not getting in there & backing the team, it is, like I said in my post it's not fair on the players or Grayson, but the aim is to impact Bates, & he ain't bothered by bad press, in fact he thrives on it. For the long term good, we may have to hurt ourselves somewhat.

a very well written piece. Unfortunately I cannot be present for the meeting but am willing to back the results of the democratic action plan and offer my help where possible. MOT

@TSS That would be great, I'm available at adam_geary@hotmail.co.uk

Agreed. Aside from those that will refuse to renew and the longer he stays, the lower our attendances will drop in my opinion

If Ken was to "kick it" in the morning.... what would happen to our club?

@lufcwhite Has he got kids? Depends on his will I guess. We'll probably end up with Harvey and be just as fucked.

No idea, I'm listening to everyone going on about it and was just wondering what the actual consequences of that would be.

No idea, I'm listening to everyone going on about it, and was just wondering what the actual consequences of that would be.

@lufcwhite Somebody who isn't Ken and probably wouldn't care about keeping hold of the club?

@Aideylufc Is there a Master Bates?

My objection to it is that I've already paid. Bates will find that hysterical, water off a ducks back.

Let's see what the general consensus come up with tomorrow and go from there.

First time on here , so big high five to everyone . I agree we need Bates out he is an excuse of a man , and i'm ashamed he is at the helm of our great club . BUT who will we get in to replace him , that's the 64 ,000$ question . As far as boycotting games i don't get it ? where will we be in 5 years ???? premiership ???? league 2 ????? what i do know is i'll be there , this club doesn't belong to Bates it's ours and no one will stop me from making the pilgrimage . I have a friend whose a Hull supporter , he can't understand what's going on , and can't believe that Leeds supporters could actually be scuppering our chances. What about manure they've the hobbit Glazer in charge they're unhappy ,so i understand , but they still go, what about Liverpool and Hicks / Gillet , Newcastle with Ashley . Yes a Saudi billionaire would be great , but they haven't got the best human rights record so what would the stay away gang do then??? , are we really going to do a character appraisal of the chairman before attending games , and what if we get one of us aka Ridsdale , well we no the rest . Am i naive enough to think we should get back to supporting the team and win lose or draw making the ER experience it used to be . Chatting to a mate the other day i realised just what we've been through in the last 10 or so years , relegationS ,promotion, play off finals, administration , oh and a Champions League semi -final , supporting Leeds is many things but never dull , so keep the faith and for those who define supporting a team as just that i'll see you at the next game , at least until the world stops going round , M O T .

There are many a Churchillian battle quotes on tonight ,god bless us all

Sad though it is unless noone goes at all ever again and i mean everyone he will not listen .

There will be 20+k a week tuesday .lust have a week to rally the troops to get noone to turn up ..

Then what if noone turns up week after week he will default on his rent payments ,so lose the right to play there ,

no money going in will result in redundancies .he will lose money but so will the club and he will wind it up .

I can not tell you how much i hate bates it is really beyond comprehension ,but with all the good intentions of LUST .and others no credible answer to him has come to the fore ,i as i have said only buy match tickets ,nothing else other have stopped going altogether .

i think the answer is to just carry on and ignore him ,do not let him come between us and our club .without the fans he has nothing ,but without the club neither do we .

IT IS OUR CLUB NOT HIS ,WE NEVER ASKED NOR WANTED HIM AT LEEDS, HE HAS NEVER BEEN AND NEVER WILL BE WELCOME FROM THE MAJORITY OF FANS CARRYING ON REGARDLESS IS THE ONLY WAY TO BEAT HIM , HE CRAVES THE ATTENTION AND WE ARE FEEDING HIS HABIT

It is clear the vast majority want Bates out but the issue is how to go about it - lots of opinions but no organisation. I personally want to see positive action. I don't agree it effects the players - They know how bad things are and so does Larry. They know our gripe is not with them. They are professionals and will get on with it - it is their job. If it they are god enough they will secure a lucrative move at the end of their contracts.

I favour the following:

A complete boycott of everything LUFC bar the match ticket.

An identity - red scarfs printed with "Bates Out" and "Why Lie Kenny" - we need to galvanise support - a visible common goal.

Still support the team but let the bastard know what we think - Bates Out from the 7th minute for 7 minutes?

One game boycott ?? - let him know this is serious and we will not accept his administration any longer.

Don't renew - at least until things change.

Whatever we do it must be with one voice - I hope LUST can achieve this

@BarneyWhite I think you're on to a loser with the 'red scarf' thing; otherwise all good suggestions. Also how about picking the televised Soton game to get as many as possible to attend the game and fill the ground with anti-Ken chants, Ken masks and if we can sneak them in, Why Lie Kenny ? banners. A near full-house would also have the added effect of helping the lads to defeat the league leaders.

to quote edmund burke - for evil to succeed all it takes is for good men to do nothing - quite apposite i thought as Bates is totally relaint on people shrugging their shoulders and saying - whats it go to do with me - but we the fans have the power to do something - we all have an opportunity here to get shut of Bates and get an investor in who we deserve.

@AGEARY1 Cheers Si, I'm sure I can pull your email from comment. Will get in touch if I'm struggling when the time comes. MOT

after reading the comments and all have good intentions, what we need to do to start with is cut off as many financial avenues for bates as we can. there is no point in screaming bates out at billys statue then getting your breath back with a beer in the pavillion or billys or in the ground. these are all essential income avenues that keep him ticking over. if boycotting the match is a bridge too far then at least dont spend another penny. i myself am a season ticket holder of the last 24 years but sadly this is my last until the current regime relinquishes power, this saddens me as leeds is a big part of my life,but feel i have been whacked with the stick too many times. my advice to people is to stop going and do not renew season tickets. sometimes you have go backwards to go forwards.

@paulclarkeonenil Agree 100%

Hi all, I've not heard it mentioned for a while, and shoot me down for probably being pie in the sky as I am far from being an expert in high business finance but how about tentatively investigating a global fans buy out? I do realise this is probably very far fetched but before crucifying me, let's first look at some figures........ How much would you surmise the old git would need for him to relinquish the reins? Conservative estimate £30-50m? So say £40m divided by say 65000 fans (10000 season ticket holders, 5000 sometime homers (18yo+), 10 - 15000 regular / UK sometime awayers, 15000 Premiership watchers only, 5000 stayawayers, 5000 foreign sometime (one-time) visitors / non Leeds fans, 10000 foreign non-visting fans) Buying one share would cost each £615. Also you can factor in local / international businessmen, wealthy fans who would probably like to get involved , Any thoughts........?

@The White Stuff Don't think he'd sell regardless, for the same reason I don't think he'll sell if/when we get promoted. He loves being the centre of attention too much, the money is an added bonus to him.

@TSS Mmm....so you reckon we're lumbered.....? call me defeatist, and as much as I would love him to go, I think you're correct we are stuck with him....(I am already refraining from purchasing anything on the premises) I can't shout out against him because we don't have an alternative..?..what worries me about action against him is techically he could pull the plug and not only would we all be a laughing stock, we would lose our great club.........

@The White Stuff Financial pressure is the only reason he sold Chelsea. They were in a worse state than Leeds and that's the only out I see for us too.

@TSS@The White Stuff alternatively 1) the authorities eventually catch up with him and he's banged up and his assets sequestrated 2) he gets a fish finger stuck in his gullet and shuffles off this mortal coil.

@The White Stuff GOOD idea although something has to be for sale, to be able to buy it

Although everything has a price leeds aint for sale it is as simple as that really

@number1inyorkshire ...ok then so we just need to find a hitman.................(JOKE!)

with all due respect to LUST sadly they are out of touch if they were not there would be the 38.000 in their ranks instead of the bates members club .

What it needs is for the people within the official members club to get together .now i am sure lust members will be lufc members ,well they will if they have season tickets ,but you can not have it both ways ..

.LUST bates will just brush off ,he has many times me too but .regional members club secretaries getting together from the official members club will get him to sit up a little .

sadly LUST you have honorable intentions but you will be wasting your time .

who is the lot at the PEACOCK ???

@number1inyorkshire LUST are stepping up to lead, nothing more. They're not restricting anything to their own members, they're just offering an outlet for discussion, direction and for the media to contact. We've needed that all along. The LUMC cannot provide that, nor will it ever attempt to. It's just a con to rake more cash in on ticket sales.

@TSS@number1inyorkshire I agree. It's not worth joining up in the official members club just to voice opinions against him - he wouldn't listen to those either!

LUST might be the key ingredient we have lacked previously - finally a figurehead to get behind.

@Gryff@TSS i am not suggesting any body joins the lumc thats not at all what i am saying especially to try get to bates .

BUT love it or loathe it that members club has taken money away from the others .

The other members clubs at leeds are useless i am sorry if that offends people who are genuinely trying to make a difference they will not..

During our financial meltdown the likes of Ray Spence appearing on the news was at best bloddy awful .

Half of the people behind most of these groups, though not all ,and bates had more or less said so in his program notes don't even go to the games at home.

Bates will spend his notes in the program ,to just riddicule them and has done before ..

Bates like his LUMC getting some of those to stand up and make a noise will make him listen ..

I hate ken bates he is a pariah that is causing unrest between the fans ,he is doing that deliberately in my opinion too and i really applaud anyone who is trying to unsettle him .but sadly i feel it is beyond the groups mentioned although it is a start ..

But if the people who have signed up to his regional members clubs got

together the top brass in them and started to show unrest it might rattle him more .

genuinely good luck to LUST but i do not think Bates will lose sleep over them i wish he would and i do not know what will, well i do nothing it seems what a C~#T

Good post. Well said Mattbb. I respect those who voice an opinion but we have to be conscious of the players, morale of the team, potential signings and potential investors. Negative vibes have to have an effect on the players, it can't be ignored. Grief has been handed out to players which makes it easier for them (and esp. their agents) to listen when other opportunities come knocking - we don't need this re-occurring. The LUFC brand has value, value we as fans have created and must continue to nurture. It might not feel like it right now but LUFC is ours, the fans. One way or another Bates will eventually be gone. LUFC does feel vulnerable right now so its our responsibility as fans to keep her right. Lets get behind the team, speak as one voice and be conscious not to do too much harm in what we perceive to be the right thing. We wont get a promotion push with negativity flying around so lets get our heads together and give the lads something positive to play for.

Well said. That's the kind of reasoned argument the meeting tomorrow needs.

Was there some mp from Leeds who was making noises a while back about bates ownership of Leeds? He was going to try and take it higher. You could try and get him involved?

90% of 2251? That indicates that at least 91% of the Saturday crowd DID NOT indicate any lack of confidence in Bates. If democracy rules, maybe you should be speaking up for that 91%.

So there's a couple of thousand whingers. This is West Yorkshire, where being miserable is in the blood. Most of those couple of thousand would be unhappy whatever's happening at the club.

I'm not happy, either. I don't think Howson is any great loss - in fact, I think it's a good thing - but I'm worried about the ambition being shown in contractual negotiations. Nevertheless, I'm not seeing any other club in the Championship (except Saints, I suppose) being run significantly better, and most are certainly being run worse. Those who want rid of Bates and/or Grayson don't seem to me to have any idea who would be better, or even that such people exist.

@LeedsForLife Thats bollocks mate.

2,251 responded - both positively and negatively. Political polls rarely take in that number of responses and are used by major news agencies as a clear indication of opinion.

To play your own game: what it shows is that of 9% of the ER crowd on saturday, over 89% were likely to have been against Bates. That's a huge chunk.

@Gryff What quick responses! Not sure which bit is bollocks. No more than 9% of the crowd reported dissatisfaction in this survey. 91% didn't, and that's a much huger chunk. I don't think that's too tricky, is it?

This was not a political poll. The size of a political poll is set by the number of people polled, and they are selected to be an un-biased sample. This was a survey of unlimited size, carried out among a group that is anyway a focus for those unsympathetic to Bates. Despite the lack of a limit, only about 2000 reported dissatisfaction.

The intention is not to wind you up, but to point out that you cannot claim to speak for anything other than a small minority of fans.

@LeedsForLife This is because TSS did not stand by the gates with a laptop getting fans to fill it in upon exit.

We have over 2,000 responses and of those responses the vast majority are disatisfied with Bates.

@TSS looks like you were right, he really IS thick.

@Gryff@TSS Just because I disagree with you or you don't understand what I've written does not make me thick.

@LeedsForLife@TSS

Look. It's simple fact:

There are over 2,000 results.

Of those 2,000 results over 90% are dissatisfied with Bates.

That means that the LIKELIHOOD is that of the fans at Elland Road, over 90% were against Bates.

Your logic was that because 2,000 is only around 9% of the attendence, that means that the other 81% don't agree.

This wasn't a tickbox questionnaire asking only for replies from fans who don't like Bates.

Your argument is just completely illogical. Not an "I don't agree" illogical, a 2 + 2 = 5 illogical.

@LeedsForLife Come on, 2,000 pollsters is not a snip by any imagination. I've just been working on an IPPR survey that looks at English reactions to Scottish devolution. It is being used in nearly all the daily national newspapers today as entirely representative of the English in the UK (nb. I had nothing to do with it, so aint bragging). They only polled a total of 1,600 people.

And yes they do biases it - they try to get representatives of both sexes, classes, occupations, ages, races as close to the UK national composition, and do so by knowing what time of day certain groups are likely to answer a 'cold call' and which regions, even streets, represent certain types.

Equal to your argument that the TSS survey doesn't represent 91% of fans at Elland Road on Saturday, to what extent do those 91% - or even the 100% - at Elland Road represent Leeds United fans? There's fans the world over, there's fans who might only be bothered to occasionally go, there's plenty who can no longer afford to go.

You might have a point to some extent that true pro-Batesites might not bother calling by the TSS, being sick of hearing the old man slandered, but it remains indicative with a margin of ?+/- for error. How much that '?' is unresolvable but considering the level of disagreement and bickering on almost everything on this site I doubt that at most Bates would have scored more than 15% if all anti-TSS Leeds fans had come calling.

@LeedsForLife@Gryff there was no surprise to me in that poll it was a captive audience to a poll of pretty much like minded people .the grayson poll was no surprise either .

but if we take a straw poll of the amount of people singing the bates out song on Saturday and other songs then that was 60-70% ,then there is the amount of people who were stood outside protesting the % of that would be smaller ..

polls are only valid for the minute the person asks the question neither are they an exact and could be loaded to gain an outcome by the question asked

And you think I'm thick!

Whatever.

@LeedsForLife@Gryff Mate, I'm not one for personal insults but you clearly aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer. You're making yourself look an absolute idiot, not because we don't understand you, but because we do.

ALL, and I mean ALL surveys to represent absolutely anything are based on a small percentage of total people. Our survey accounts for more than 10% of the total attendance at ER on Saturday and probably 1% of Leeds United fans in general. If you ask a large enough sample size of people a yes or no question, then that sample size will be representative for the entire fanbase. That's a fact.

As part of my degree I had to study the broader social science discipline. We used surveys and opinion polls every day to show how people felt in relation to one thing or another, and for the entire British public (60+ million people?) we used less than 2,000 people as scientific evidence to back-up a theory or make an argument. Governments used smaller sample sizes, so do market research firms. They don't do this to ignore the other 59,999,000, they do it to get a representative sample of the entire country.

I don't know why I'm wasting my time, I'm give you the benefit of doubt and conclude that you're an incredibly talented WUM. Not the idiot you're making yourself out to be.