<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why we should sell Beckford this January</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/</link>
	<description>Following the ups and downs of Leeds United. LUFC news, blog and rumours.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:42:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/#comment-4916</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescratchingshed.com/?p=1260#comment-4916</guid>
		<description>Looks like Becks is staying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Becks is staying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/#comment-4809</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescratchingshed.com/?p=1260#comment-4809</guid>
		<description>Tell you what I am looking forward to the transfer window closing whatever happens! sick of hearing about JB.
I think he will still be at ER till the season ends - its simply too great a risk to let him go. As previously pointed out if we dont go up we could well lose another 3 or 4 players that I personaly rate higher than JB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell you what I am looking forward to the transfer window closing whatever happens! sick of hearing about JB.<br />
I think he will still be at ER till the season ends &#8211; its simply too great a risk to let him go. As previously pointed out if we dont go up we could well lose another 3 or 4 players that I personaly rate higher than JB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt wright</title>
		<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/#comment-4800</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescratchingshed.com/?p=1260#comment-4800</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to say this mate, this story like many others in my opinion is written with so much accuracy and enough to back yourself up that I&#039;ve just got to say thankyou. Great site mate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to say this mate, this story like many others in my opinion is written with so much accuracy and enough to back yourself up that I&#8217;ve just got to say thankyou. Great site mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dje</title>
		<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/#comment-4798</link>
		<dc:creator>Dje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescratchingshed.com/?p=1260#comment-4798</guid>
		<description>A lot of ground covered in all the replies above, so I&#039;m at risk of not adding anything new here:

There does seem to be a consensus though that Leeds minus Beckford = probably get promoted without him, but those pesky teams, Colchester, Norwich and Charlton, seem to be unsportingly refusing to give up the chase, so there&#039;s a risk that we might end up in the play-offs and that always equals failure for us to get promoted. 

Alternatively, the consensus seems to be Leeds plus Beckford = 15-20 more goals from him and an (almost) inevitable promotion to the Championship. 

So we run the risk of losing £1.5-2m worth of striking talent, and during the Summer we would need to stump up this amount to potentially find a new Beckford, or better, but what is the cost to the team of failing to get promoted? David Coleman touched on the potential damage this might have on our squad. Can you see Howson, Snodgrass, Becchio not finding suitors from higher division teams - or them having to face yet another season of their progressing careers lumbered in the third tier of English football? Kisnorbo, Kilkenny, Johnson, White and Grella might also be sort after. That&#039;s quite a risk, no? It&#039;d take more than £1.5-2m to tempt adequete replacements to step down to life in League One. 

Conversly, and here&#039;s one for TSS and his interest in Hooper, if we keep Beckford and he goes in the Summer  on a free, but Scunthorpe get relelgated to League One, might our cost of replacing Beckford with Hooper be a tad cheaper than if we tried to tempt their best resource for maintaining Championship-status away from Glanford Park during this transfer window? 

Finally, I agree with the doubters, whatever we get for Beckford, after the cut goes to Wealdstone and Rubery, there&#039;ll be little on offer to Grayson in way of replacement - at least before the Summer. Or rather, there&#039;ll not be enough to replace Beckford like-for-like. I see the compromise offered to our fans being £200,000 for Gradel. Gradel would be a useful addition, true, but would you trade-in a player who&#039;s likely to score at any point in the ninety minutes - ie. potentially putting the game to bed before halftime - for one that might score but only in last 20 minutes as a substitue. Too risky for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of ground covered in all the replies above, so I&#8217;m at risk of not adding anything new here:</p>
<p>There does seem to be a consensus though that Leeds minus Beckford = probably get promoted without him, but those pesky teams, Colchester, Norwich and Charlton, seem to be unsportingly refusing to give up the chase, so there&#8217;s a risk that we might end up in the play-offs and that always equals failure for us to get promoted. </p>
<p>Alternatively, the consensus seems to be Leeds plus Beckford = 15-20 more goals from him and an (almost) inevitable promotion to the Championship. </p>
<p>So we run the risk of losing £1.5-2m worth of striking talent, and during the Summer we would need to stump up this amount to potentially find a new Beckford, or better, but what is the cost to the team of failing to get promoted? David Coleman touched on the potential damage this might have on our squad. Can you see Howson, Snodgrass, Becchio not finding suitors from higher division teams &#8211; or them having to face yet another season of their progressing careers lumbered in the third tier of English football? Kisnorbo, Kilkenny, Johnson, White and Grella might also be sort after. That&#8217;s quite a risk, no? It&#8217;d take more than £1.5-2m to tempt adequete replacements to step down to life in League One. </p>
<p>Conversly, and here&#8217;s one for TSS and his interest in Hooper, if we keep Beckford and he goes in the Summer  on a free, but Scunthorpe get relelgated to League One, might our cost of replacing Beckford with Hooper be a tad cheaper than if we tried to tempt their best resource for maintaining Championship-status away from Glanford Park during this transfer window? </p>
<p>Finally, I agree with the doubters, whatever we get for Beckford, after the cut goes to Wealdstone and Rubery, there&#8217;ll be little on offer to Grayson in way of replacement &#8211; at least before the Summer. Or rather, there&#8217;ll not be enough to replace Beckford like-for-like. I see the compromise offered to our fans being £200,000 for Gradel. Gradel would be a useful addition, true, but would you trade-in a player who&#8217;s likely to score at any point in the ninety minutes &#8211; ie. potentially putting the game to bed before halftime &#8211; for one that might score but only in last 20 minutes as a substitue. Too risky for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheReaper08</title>
		<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/#comment-4794</link>
		<dc:creator>TheReaper08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescratchingshed.com/?p=1260#comment-4794</guid>
		<description>None of it stacks up Craig but you will never convince the doubters or knockers my friend. They would have us believe that Beckford is the only lazy striker in the world that is lazy and has a bad first touch. That any striker in his position would get twice as many goals as he is so so wasteful. The simple fact that no other striker has come close is because they spend there entire game working to set Beckford up. 

Jermaine Beckford = 72 goals in a 116 starts with 12 sub appearances. A ratio of 0.56 goals to games which is currently unmatched in the English leagues by anyone playing more than two seasons.

He will be missed.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of it stacks up Craig but you will never convince the doubters or knockers my friend. They would have us believe that Beckford is the only lazy striker in the world that is lazy and has a bad first touch. That any striker in his position would get twice as many goals as he is so so wasteful. The simple fact that no other striker has come close is because they spend there entire game working to set Beckford up. </p>
<p>Jermaine Beckford = 72 goals in a 116 starts with 12 sub appearances. A ratio of 0.56 goals to games which is currently unmatched in the English leagues by anyone playing more than two seasons.</p>
<p>He will be missed&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/#comment-4792</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescratchingshed.com/?p=1260#comment-4792</guid>
		<description>Just saw an interesting stat on the Johnstones paint bulletin. Apparently Beckford&#039;s league shooting stats this season are 95 shots, 52 of which were on target. This contradicts his knockers who would have us believe that he isn&#039;t able to shoot accurately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw an interesting stat on the Johnstones paint bulletin. Apparently Beckford&#8217;s league shooting stats this season are 95 shots, 52 of which were on target. This contradicts his knockers who would have us believe that he isn&#8217;t able to shoot accurately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheReaper08</title>
		<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/#comment-4790</link>
		<dc:creator>TheReaper08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescratchingshed.com/?p=1260#comment-4790</guid>
		<description>TSS you hit the nail on the head when you said people have to decide how you want the business that is Leeds Utd to be run, heart or head ?

Do we think that promotion will be achieved by keeping Beckford ? If we sell can it be achieved with a replacement or from current stock ? For what it&#039;s worth I think it can be achieved but only with a suitable replacement. Norwich and Charlton are too close to not have a very good goalscorer in the pack, anyone fancy 3rd place and another tilt at the play offs? No, me neither.

As for Bates and the money saga,until we know what Larry has asked for you can&#039;t convict Bates of not splashing the cash. No manger so far has complained about not being supported in the transfer market by the chairman and that&#039;s good enough for me. I believe (and no doubt I will get pulled apart on this) that the club are preparing with half an eye on the CCC, funds will be needed if as we all hope we get there this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TSS you hit the nail on the head when you said people have to decide how you want the business that is Leeds Utd to be run, heart or head ?</p>
<p>Do we think that promotion will be achieved by keeping Beckford ? If we sell can it be achieved with a replacement or from current stock ? For what it&#8217;s worth I think it can be achieved but only with a suitable replacement. Norwich and Charlton are too close to not have a very good goalscorer in the pack, anyone fancy 3rd place and another tilt at the play offs? No, me neither.</p>
<p>As for Bates and the money saga,until we know what Larry has asked for you can&#8217;t convict Bates of not splashing the cash. No manger so far has complained about not being supported in the transfer market by the chairman and that&#8217;s good enough for me. I believe (and no doubt I will get pulled apart on this) that the club are preparing with half an eye on the CCC, funds will be needed if as we all hope we get there this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/#comment-4787</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescratchingshed.com/?p=1260#comment-4787</guid>
		<description>Not sure I understand your point Colin? If a club wants Beckford badly enough but Leeds don&#039;t let him leave in Jan then a pre-contract would be their best option - they still get him for free in the summer but they would be guaranteed his signature rather than potentially having someone beat them to it in May.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I understand your point Colin? If a club wants Beckford badly enough but Leeds don&#8217;t let him leave in Jan then a pre-contract would be their best option &#8211; they still get him for free in the summer but they would be guaranteed his signature rather than potentially having someone beat them to it in May.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/#comment-4785</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescratchingshed.com/?p=1260#comment-4785</guid>
		<description>No splinters on my bottom from fence sitting. I have never been a fan of Mr Beckford, reasons being i think he is lazy, self centred and has too high an opinion on himself. Yes, i agree i could be talking about most strikers there lol
It is not the end of the world to lose 1 player and i think it is fantastic to finally have someone point out that there are other strikers ahead of him in the league goal tally.
Simon Grayson wasnt the &quot;front runner&quot; with the book makers for the Leeds job and some people were very surprised to have him employed for the job, but oh what a job this man has done.
Beckford plays the way he does because the coaching staff, players and fans help him realise 100% potential. If/when he does leave i think that will be the end of him We as a club obviously didnt unleash Cantonas full potential, but, another club did.
He has asked to be transferred out of Leeds NOT because he isnt being played, has success or a well liked team member. Money is the reason why and i for one cant wait to see the back of the greedy little git.
Sayonara son</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No splinters on my bottom from fence sitting. I have never been a fan of Mr Beckford, reasons being i think he is lazy, self centred and has too high an opinion on himself. Yes, i agree i could be talking about most strikers there lol<br />
It is not the end of the world to lose 1 player and i think it is fantastic to finally have someone point out that there are other strikers ahead of him in the league goal tally.<br />
Simon Grayson wasnt the &#8220;front runner&#8221; with the book makers for the Leeds job and some people were very surprised to have him employed for the job, but oh what a job this man has done.<br />
Beckford plays the way he does because the coaching staff, players and fans help him realise 100% potential. If/when he does leave i think that will be the end of him We as a club obviously didnt unleash Cantonas full potential, but, another club did.<br />
He has asked to be transferred out of Leeds NOT because he isnt being played, has success or a well liked team member. Money is the reason why and i for one cant wait to see the back of the greedy little git.<br />
Sayonara son</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2010/01/why-we-should-sell-beckford-this-january/#comment-4782</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thescratchingshed.com/?p=1260#comment-4782</guid>
		<description>Not sure any club would take option 3. If you want Beckford, surely you want either Beckford now or sign him on a free when his contract expires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure any club would take option 3. If you want Beckford, surely you want either Beckford now or sign him on a free when his contract expires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
